首页 > 题库 > 考研考博 > 考博英语 > 中国社会科学院 > 单选题

In a letter to a friend, George Orwell wrote, “It is impossible to mention Jews in print, either favorably or unfavorably, without getting into trouble.” But there are times when trouble had better be got into before mere trouble turns into catastrophe. Jews,blacks, and homosexualists are despised by the majorities of East and West. Also, as a result of the invention of Israel, Jews can now count on the hatred of the Islamic world. Since America’s own Christian majority looks to be getting ready for great adventures at home and abroad, I would suggest that the three despised minorities join forces in order not to be destroyed. This seems an obvious thing to do. Unfortunately, most Jews refuse to see any similarity between their special situation and that of the same-sexers. At one level, the Jews are perfectly correct. A racial or religious or tribal identity is a kind of fact. Although sexual preference is an even more powerful fact, it is not one that creates any particular social or cultural or religious bond between those so-minded. Although Jews would doubtless be Jews if there was no anti-Semitism, same-sexers would think little or nothing at all about their preference if society ignored it. So there is a difference between the two estates. But there is no difference in the degree of hatred felt by the Christian majority for Christ-killers and Sodomites. In the German concentration camps, Jews wore yellow stars while homosexualists wore pink triangles. I was present when Christopher Isherwood tried to make this point to a young Jewish movie producer. “After all,” said Isherwood, “Hitler killed six hundred thousand homosexuals.” The young man was not impressed. “But Hitler killed six million Jews,” he said sternly. “What are you?” asked Isherwood. “In real estate?”
Like it or not, Jews and homosexualists are in the same fragile boat, and one would have to be pretty obtuse not to see the common danger. But obtuseness is the name of the game among New York’s new class. Harper’s Magazine and Commentary usually publish these pieces, though other periodicals are not above printing the odd expose of the latest homosexual conspiracy to turn the United States over to the Soviet Union or to structuralism or to Christian Dior. Although the new class’s thoughts are never much in themselves, and they themselves are no more than spear carriers in the political and cultural life of the West, their prejudices and superstitions do register in a subliminal way, making mephitic the air of Manhattan if not of the Republic.
Although the kindness of strangers is much sought after, gay liberation has not got much support from anyone. Natural allies like the Jews are often virulent in their attacks. Blacks in their ghettos, Chicanos in their barrios, and rednecks in their pulpits also have been influenced by the same tribal taboos. That Jews and blacks and Chicanos and rednecks all contribute to the ranks of the same-sexers only increases the madness.
Herewith the burden of “The Boys on the Beach”: since homosexualists choose to be the way they are out of idle hatefulness, it has been a mistake to allow them to come out of the closet to the extent that they have, but now that they are out (which most are not), they will have no choice but to face up to their essential hatefulness and abnormality and so be driven to kill themselves with promiscuity, drugs, and suicide. Not even the authors of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” ever suggested that the Jews, who were so hateful to them, were also hateful to themselves. So Decter has managed to go one step further than the Protocols’ authors; she is indeed a virtuoso of hate, and thus do pogroms begin.
1.The author argues that a key difference between anti-Semitism and homophobia is  (  ).  
2.In the second paragraph, obtuseness is used to mean (  ).  
3.The meaning we are meant to take from the conversation between Christopher Isherwood and the film producer is (  ).  
4.The author believes that the arguments put forth in “The Boys on the Beach” (  ).  
5.The author argues that(  ).

问题1选项
A.anti-semitism can be effectively stopped through the use of Hollywood movies
B.homophobia directly affects members of many different ethnic and religious groups
C.anti-semitism is a relic of the 19th century
D.homophobia is primarily spread through written texts
问题2选项
A.being unwilling to understand or grasp new concepts
B.Jewish dislike of homosexuals
C.mental or emotional disability
D.deficit of understanding
问题3选项
A.that Jews have suffered worse than homosexuals
B.that homosexuals and Jews both suffered terribly under the Nazi regime
C.that loss of human life maybe easily and meaningfully quantified
D.that Hollywood produces films that meaningfully explores the Nazi murder of Jews and homosexuals alike
问题4选项
A.echo the themes of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
B.are similar to those arguments heard before
C.may lead to an organized massacre of a specific group
D.can be meaningfully interpreted through the lens of the Jewish experience in America
问题5选项
A.homosexuality and Judaism are necessarily mutually exclusive, but both are in danger
B.homosexuals and Jews share a common interest injustice
C.“The Boys on the Beach”, like “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” is a threat to homosexuals
D.identity groups that are frequently discriminated against should support each other
参考答案: 查看答案 查看解析 下载APP畅快刷题

相关知识点试题

相关试卷