It was no accident that nineteenth-century naturalist Charles Darwin strove to connect the mentality and emotionality of people with that of dogs, rather than, say, doves or horses. Neither his theory of evolution nor any general understanding of biology demanded that the preferentially underline our similarity to dogs over other species. But politically and emotionally, the choice was inevitable for an English gentleman who had set himself the task of making the idea of evolutionary continuity palatable. Darwin wrote that “dogs possess something very similar to a conscience. They certainly possess some power of self-command. ... Dogs have long been accepted as the very type of fidelity and obedience.”
Darwin was not alone in his beliefs that dog possess human virtues. The characteristics of loyalty and obedience, coupled with an expressive face and body, can account for why dogs are such popular and valued pets in many cultures. Depending on the breed and the individual, dogs can be noble, charming, affectionate, and reliable. But while all dog owners should rightly appreciate these and other endearing traits in their pets, nothing says that the cleverness of a highly intelligent primate such as a chimpanzee is part of the package. Scientists generally believe the reasoning abilities of chimps to be considerably greater than that of dogs. But many people nonetheless believe that dogs are smarter than chimps precisely because of our familiarity and emotional ties with the dogs that we love. We apply the same secret rules to our fellow humans: the old in-group, out-group story. People in your in-group are those who are similar to you, either because they belong to the same organizations as you, or enjoy the same activities, or, and this is the kicker, because they are simply around more often. Dogs, because of their proximity to their owners, are definitely in. The intensity of our relationship with dogs causes us, quite naturally, to imbue them with high-level mental abilities, whether they have earned those extra intelligence points or not. We like them, so we think well of them.
21. The author of this passage develops an argument by relying on ______.
22. The phrase “It was no accident” implies that the author believes that Darwin ______.
23. The italic “believe” in the middle of this passage most directly emphasize ______.
24. This passage uses the word of “old” (in bold) to suggest that the “story” is ______.
问题1选项
A.personal experience
B.scientific observation
C.historical contextualization
D.direct quotation
问题2选项
A.knew that the resemblance between dogs and humans could not be accounted for by his theory
B.exploited the sympathies of his audience to gain support for his theory
C.believed that the way previous authors have written about dogs was inaccurate
D.wished to convince the public to celebrate the virtues of dogs
问题3选项
A.a misguided idea that is becoming obsolete
B.a negative view that scientists adopt toward lay people
C.the controversial nature of an alternative theory
D.the intensity of a conviction based on sentiment
问题4选项
A.familiar
B.historic
C.tiresome
D.outdated
21.【选项释义】
21. The author of this passage develops an argument by relying on ______. 21. 这篇文章的作者通过______展开了一个论点。
A. personal experience A. 个人经验
B. scientific observation B. 科学观察
C. historical contextualization C. 历史情境
D. direct quotation D. 直接引用
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】根据文章第一段最后一句“达尔文写道:‘狗拥有一种非常类似于良心的东西。他们当然有一定的自我控制能力。……长期以来,狗一直被认为是忠诚和服从的象征。’”,从中我们可知,作者是直接引用了达尔文提出的论点来展开文章的论点,故D项正确。
【干扰项排除】A、B、C选项均不符合第一段原文,属于曲解原文。
22.【选项释义】
22. The phrase “It was no accident” implies that the author believes that Darwin ______. 22. “这不是偶然的”意味着作者相信达尔文______。
A. knew that the resemblance between dogs and humans could not be accounted for by his theory A. 知道他的理论无法解释狗和人的相似之处
B. exploited the sympathies of his audience to gain support for his theory B. 利用了他的读者的同情来为他的理论获得支持
C. believed that the way previous authors have written about dogs was inaccurate C. 认为之前的作者对狗的描述是不准确的
D. wished to convince the public to celebrate the virtues of dogs D. 希望说服公众赞美狗的美德
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】首先,根据题干定位到第一段第一句“19世纪的自然学家达尔文力图把人类的思想状况和情况与狗联系起来,而不是和比如鸽子或者马联系起来,这不是偶然”,从中可推断,达尔文对狗的一些品质是表示赞扬的,D选项符合原文意思,因此,该题选择D项正确。
【干扰项排除】
A、B选项表述曲解原文;
C选项并没有提到,属于无中生有。
23.【选项释义】
23. The italic “believe” in the middle of this passage most directly emphasize ______. 23. 文章中间斜体的believe最直接地强调了______。
A. a misguided idea that is becoming obsolete A. 一个正在过时的错误观点
B. a negative view that scientists adopt toward lay people B. 科学家对普通人的消极看法
C. the controversial nature of an alternative theory C. 另一种理论的争议性
D. the intensity of a conviction based on sentiment D. 基于情感的信念的强度
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】定位到斜体believe在原文的位置,在第二段第六句“尽管如此,还是有很多人相信狗比黑猩猩更聪明,这正是因为我们对我们所爱的狗的熟悉和情感联系(familiarity and emotional ties)”,从中可知,我们对狗的高度赞赏是因为我们对狗的情感,所以believe强调的是一种基于情感信念的强度,D项正确。
【干扰项排除】
A、B选项在文中没有体现,属于无中生有;
C选项中的an alternative theory(另一种理论)没有提到,属于曲解原文。
24.【选项释义】
24. This passage uses the word of “old” (in bold) to suggest that the “story” is ______. 24. 这篇文章用了“old”这个词来暗示这个“故事”是______。
A. familiar A. 熟悉的
B. historic B. 有历史意义的
C. tiresome C. 烦人的
D. outdated D. 过时的
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】首先,定位old至文章第二段第七句“我们将同样的秘密规则应用于我们的人类同胞:古老的圈内和圈外的故事”,从中我们可以推测出,old表示“有历史意义的”,B选项符合。
【干扰项排除】A、C、D选项均不符合原文,属于曲解原文。