首页 > 题库 > 考研考博 > 考博英语 > 四川大学 > 单选题

Many people take for granted that all art should be beautiful. We may as well face the question squarely since it is basic to our whole attitude toward art. Why are there so many “ugly” works of art? There are several possible answers. We might reply that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”. In other words, beauty subjective, and your personal taste leads you to reject things that might be beautiful to others. Both “beautiful” and “ugly” imply aesthetic value judgments.
This possibility depends on the assumption that the artist’s proper aim is the creation of beauty. But there is another possibility. Perhaps the works are successes by artists who were sincerely aiming at something other than conventional, physical beauty. Would an artist intentionally make something ugly? And what, actually, do we mean by the words “ugly” and “beautiful”?
Over the centuries numerous writers have grappled with the concept of beauty and tried to understand it. One of the most entertaining was the 18th-century British statesman Edmund Burke, who wrote an essay called “The Sublime and the Beautiful”. In the essay Burke defined beauty as a positive and striking quality that produces pleasure by being small, smooth, gradually or gently varied, delicate, softly and variable colored. It is submissive and may arouse love. Beauty is not related to proportion, said Burke, not to functional fitness, nor even to perfection. All these things are found apart from beauty.
The sublime, by contrast, is vast even to infinity, difficult, magnificent, dark and rugged. According to Burke, it will “fill the mind with that sort of delightful horror, which is the most genuine effect and earliest test of the sublime”. A thing may be ugly and yet sublime if it is “united with such qualities as excite a strong terror”. Burke made it clear that greatness lies on the side of sublime, not of the beautiful.
This is quite a useful idea. Let’s keep it in mind while we look at Ivan Albright’s painting Ida. Albright’s work is not smooth, delicate, or soft, and it is not likely to arouse love. For most people, though, it would evoke delightful horror. What is the artist aiming at? A common reaction is to say that the artist is showing us a person who is physically and mentally—even spiritually-exhausted. According to this interpretation, Albright teaches us about spiritual decay. Every bulge, every wrinkle, every wart stands for a nasty blow that.
1. We can see from the first two paragraphs that _____.
2. Which of the following statements might Burke have agree with?
3. Which of the following can be said of Albright’s painting?
4. It can be inferred from the passage that _____.
5. The author wrote this article to _____.

问题1选项
A.beauty and ugliness are two concepts embodied in different forms
B.neither beauty nor ugliness can be definitely defined
C.beauty and ugliness are opposite artistic expressions
D.beauty is subjective while ugliness is objective
问题2选项
A.The sublime might not be beautiful but the beautiful must be the sublime.
B.Delightful horror derives from the sublime.
C.The beautiful is of a positive quality while the sublime is of a negative one.
D.The ugly may not necessarily be the sublime.
问题3选项
A.It destroys people’s hopes in life.
B.It is in most viewers’ eyes, a beautiful piece of art.
C.It presents something sublime in Burke’s view.
D.It defines any interpretation.
问题4选项
A.the author is a strong supporter of Burke’s aesthetic theory
B.the author is worried about the so many ugly works of art produced today
C.Albright’s painting has aroused controversy
D.beauty doesn’t lie in works of art themselves
问题5选项
A.differentiate the beautiful and the ugly
B.describe to us Albright’s painting
C.introduce to us Burke’s aesthetic theory
D.teach us the right way to evaluate works of art
参考答案: 查看答案 查看解析 查看视频解析 下载APP畅快刷题

相关知识点试题

相关试卷