It’s true that high-school coding classes aren’t essential for learning computer science in college. Students without experience can catch up after a few introductory courses, said Tom Cortina, the assistant dean at Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science.
However, Cortina said, early exposure is beneficial. When younger kids learn computer science, they learn that it’s not just a confusing, endless string of letters and numbers — but a tool to build apps, or create artwork, or test hypotheses. It’s not as hard for them to transform their thought processes as it is for older students. Breaking down problems into bite-sized chunks and using code to solve them becomes normal. Giving more children this training could increase the number of people interested in the field and help fill the jobs gap, Cortina said.
Students also benefit from learning something about coding before they get to college, where introductory computer-science classes are packed to the brim, which can drive the less-experienced or-determined students away.
The Flatiron School, where people pay to learn programming, started as one of the many coding bootcamps that’s become popular for adults looking for a career change. The high-schoolers get the same curriculum, but “we try to gear lessons toward things they’re interested in,” said Victoria Friedman, an instructor. For instance, one of the apps the students are developing suggests movies based on your mood.
The students in the Flatiron class probably won’t drop out of high school and build the next Facebook. Programming languages have a quick turnover, so the “Ruby on Rails” language they learned may not even be relevant by the time they enter the job market. But the skills they learn — how to think logically through a problem and organize the results — apply to any coding language, said Deborah Seehorn, an education consultant for the state of North Carolina.
Indeed, the Flatiron students might not go into IT at all. But creating a future army of coders is not the sole purpose of the classes. These kids are going to be surrounded by computers — in their pockets, in their offices, in their homes — for the rest of their lives. The younger they learn how computers think, how to coax the machine into producing what they want — the earlier they learn that they have the power to do that — the better.
1.Cortina holds that early exposure to computer science makes it easier to( ).
3.In delivering lessons for high-schoolers, Flatiron has considered their ( ).
3.Deborah Seehorn believes that the skills learned at Flatiron will ( ).
4.According to the last paragraph, Flatiron students are expected to ( ).
5.The word “coax” (Line4, Para.6) is closest in meaning to( ).
问题1选项
A.complete future job training
B.remodel the way of thinking
C.formulate logical hypotheses
D.perfect artwork production
问题2选项
A.experience
B.academic backgrounds
C.career prospects
D.interest
问题3选项
A.help students learn other computer languages
B.have to be upgraded when new technologies come
C.need improving when students look for jobs
D.enable students to make big quick money
问题4选项
A.compete with a future army of programmers
B.stay longer in the information technology industry
C.become better prepared for the digitalized world
D.bring forth innovative computer technologies
问题5选项
A.challenge
B.persuade
C.frighten
D.misguide
第1题:B
第2题:D
第3题:A
第4题:C
第5题:B
第1题:
【选项释义】
Cortina holds that early exposure to computer science makes it easier to _____. 科尔蒂纳认为早点接触计算机科学会使_____变得更容易。
A. complete future job training A. 完成未来工作培训
B. remodel the way of thinking B. 重塑思维方式
C. formulate logical hypotheses C. 构想逻辑假设
D. perfect artwork production D. 完善艺术制作
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】由题干定位到文章第二段。首句提到Cortina认为早接触计算机科学有好处,下文中第三句具体说到“对他们来说,转变思维过程并不像对年纪较大的学生那样困难”,not as hard…as正好对应题干中的“make it easier”。换句话说,早接触计算机科学的孩子会更容易转变自己的思维,对应B选项内容。
【干扰项排除】
A、C、D选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。
第2题:
【选项释义】
In delivering lessons for high-schoolers, Flatiron has considered their _____. 在为高中生上课时,熨斗学校考虑了他们的_____。
A. experience A. 经历
B. academic backgrounds B. 学术背景
C. career prospects C. 职业背景
D. interest D. 兴趣
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】由题干中关键词定位到文章第四段第二句“高中生的课程设置是一样的,但我们试着让课程适应他们感兴趣的东西”,这里的we指上文出现的The Flatiron School。可知熨斗学校在为高中生授课时,考虑了他们的兴趣。因此D选项符合题意。
【干扰项排除】
A、B、C选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。
第3题:
【选项释义】
Deborah Seehorn believes that the skills learned at Flatiron will _____. 黛博拉·希霍恩认为在熨斗学校学到的技能会_____。
A. help students learn other computer languages A. 有助于学生掌握其他计算机语言
B. have to be upgraded when new technologies come B. 在新科技到来时不得不进行改进
C. need improving when students look for jobs C. 在学生找工作时需要提高
D. enable students to make big quick money D. 使学生能够快速地赚大钱
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】由题干定位到第五段第三句“但是他们学到的技能——如何有逻辑地充分思考某问题并整理结果——适用于任何一种编码语言(any coding language)”,也就是选项A符合原文。
【干扰项排除】
B、C、D选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。
第4题:
【选项释义】
According to the last paragraph, Flatiron students are expected to _____. 根据最后一段可知,熨斗学校的学生预计会_____。
A. compete with a future army of programmers A. 与未来的程序员大军竞争
B. stay longer in the information technology industry B. 在IT行业从业较长时间
C. become better prepared for the digitalized world C. 为数字化世界做好更充分的准备
D. bring forth innovative computer technologies D. 带来创新的计算机技术
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】最后一段第二句表明了熨斗学校的目的不仅限于(not the sole purpose)“培养编码人员”,下文说了孩子未来所面临的一个数字化的状况,也就是说计算机也将继续影响人们的生活,人们越早(younger)接触计算机知识,了解其思维方式,为我所用就越好,所以选项C符合原文。
【干扰项排除】
A选项“与未来的程序员大军竞争”,原文只提到了“培养程序员大军不是熨斗学校的唯一目的”,无法推出该选项的内容,属于无中生有;
B选项“在IT行业从业较长时间”,原文提到的是“熨斗学校的学生可能根本不会从事IT行业”,属于曲解原文;
D选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。
第5题:
【选项释义】
The word “coax” (Line4, Para.6) is closest in meaning to _____. 与“coax”(第六段第四行)含义最接近的是_____。
A. challenge A. 挑战
B. persuade B. 劝服
C. frighten C. 吓唬
D. misguide D. 误导
【考查点】词义推测题。
【解题思路】根据题干定位到文章最后一段第四句“他们越早学习电脑如何思维,如何……这一机器去制作自己需要的东西”,从全文主旨来说,让青少年学习计算机编码知识的目的在于利用计算机处理实际问题,选项B在感情色彩上符合“利用计算机来实现目标”。
【干扰项排除】
A、C、D选项不符合词义,属于曲解原文。