The energy crunch, which is being felt around the world, has dramatized how the reckless despoiling of the earth’s resources has brought the whole world to brink of disaster. The over development of motor transport, with its spiral of more cars, more highway, more pollution, more suburbs, more commuting, has contributed to the near-destruction of our cities, the disintegration of the family, and the pollution not only of local air, but also of the earth’s atmosphere. The catastrophe has arrived in the form of the energy crunch.
Our present situation is unlike war, revolution or depression. It is also unlike the great natural catastrophes of the past. Worldwide resources exploitation and energy use have brought us to a state where long-range planning is crucial. What we need is not a continuation of our present perilous state, which endangers the future of our country, our children and our earth, but a movement forward to a new norm in order to work rapidly and effectively on planetary problems.
This country has been reeling under the continuing exposures of loss of moral integrity and the revelation that lawbreaking has reached into the highest places in the land. There is a strong demand for moral reinvigoration and for some commitment that is vast enough and yet personal enough to enlist the loyalty of all. In the past it has been only in a war in defense of their own country and their own ideals that any people have been able to invoke a total commitment.
This is the first time that we have been asked to defend ourselves and what we hold dear in cooperation with all the other inhabitants of this planet, who share with us the same endangered air and the same endangered oceans. There is a common need to reassess our present course, to change that course and to devise new methods through which the world can survive. This is a priceless opportunity.
To grasp it, we need a widespread understanding of nature of the crisis confronting us—and the world—a crisis that is no passing inconvenience, no by-product of the ambitions of the oil-producing countries, no figment of environmentalists’ fears, no byproduct of any present system of government. What we face is the outcome of the invention of the last four hundred years. What we need is a transformed lifestyle. This new life style can flow directly from science and technology, but its acceptance depends on an overriding commitment to a higher quality of life for the world’s children and future generation.
1. According to the author, the energy crisis has led the world close to _____.
2. What does the author think has contributed to the near disaster of our cities?
3. Which of the following indicates our loss of moral integrity according to the passage?
4. By comparing past with present, the author wants to draw people’s attention to the ______.
5. Which of the following commitments does the author feel people need to make?
问题1选项
A.union
B.revival
C.destruction
D.Over-development
问题2选项
A.The breakup of families.
B.Reckless financial planning.
C.Natural disasters.
D.The excessive growth of motor transportation.
问题3选项
A.Despoiling of natural resources.
B.Lack of loyalty.
C.Lack of mutual understanding.
D.Disintegration of the family.
问题4选项
A.significance of this crisis
B.inadequacy of governments
C.similarity of the past to the present
D.hopelessness of the situation
问题5选项
A.Exploring more energy sources.
B.Outlawing motor transportation.
C.Taking a new lifestyle.
D.Transforming the present, government system.
第1题:C
第2题:D
第3题:B
第4题:A
第5题:C
第1题:
【选项释义】
According to the author, the energy crisis has led the world close to _____. 作者认为,能源危机使世界接近_____。
A. union A. 联合
B. revival B. 复兴
C. destruction C. 毁灭
D. over-development D. 过度发展
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】根据题干可以定位答案所在区域为第一段。根据第一段第一句“世界各地都感受到了能源危机,这严重地说明了不计后果地掠夺地球资源是如何将整个世界带到灾难的边缘的”可知能源危机使世界接近毁灭,所以正确答案为C选项。
【干扰项排除】
A、B、D选项均属于曲解原文。
第2题:
【选项释义】
What does the author think has contributed to the near disaster of our cities? 作者认为是什么导致了我们城市的灾难?
A. The breakup of families. A. 家庭的破裂。
B. Reckless financial planning. B. 不计后果的财务规划。
C. Natural disasters. C. 自然灾害。
D. The excessive growth of motor transportation. D. 汽车运输的过度增长。
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】根据题干可以定位答案所在区域为第一段。根据第一段第二句内容:“汽车运输的过度发展,伴随着越来越多的汽车、越来越多的公路、越来越多的污染、越来越多的郊区、越来越多的通勤,已经导致我们的城市几近毁灭,家庭解体,不仅污染了当地的空气,还污染了地球的大气层”可知导致我们城市的灾难是汽车运输的过度增长,所以正确答案为D选项。
【干扰项排除】
A选项:“家庭的破裂”,根据第一段第二句可知该选项属于汽车运输的过度发展所带来的灾难之一,该选项属于张冠李戴;
B、C选项原文均没有提及,属于无中生有。
第3题:
【选项释义】
Which of the following indicates our loss of moral integrity according to the passage? 根据文章,下列哪项表明我们失去了道德操守?
A. Despoiling of natural resources. A. 掠夺自然资源。
B. Lack of loyalty. B. 忠诚的缺失。
C. Lack of mutual understanding. C. 缺少相互谅解。
D. Disintegration of the family. D. 家庭解体。
【考查点】判断推理题。
【解题思路】根据题干可以定位答案所在区域为第三段。根据第三段第二句“人们强烈要求重振道德,要求做出某种承诺,这种承诺既足够广泛,又足够个人,足以赢得所有人的忠诚”可知道德的重振需要人们的忠诚,因此可以推测出:忠诚的缺失便意味着道德的缺失。正确答案为B选项。
【干扰项排除】
A、C、D选项均属于曲解原文。
第4题:
【选项释义】
By comparing past with present, the author wants to draw people’s attention to the______. 通过对比过去和现在,作者想要引起人们对______的注意。
A. significance of this crisis A. 这场危机的重要性
B. inadequacy of governments B. 政府的不足
C. similarity of the past to the present C. 过去和现在的相似
D. hopelessness of the situation D. 对形势的绝望
【考查点】语义推断题。
【解题思路】根据题干可以定位答案所在区域为第三段和第四段。结合第三段最后一句“在过去,只有当人们为自己的国家或理想而战时,他们才能做出如此毫无保留的奉献”,及第四段第一句“这是我们第一次被要求与其他国民一起合作,保护我们自己和我们珍视的东西,他们与我们共享同样的濒危空气和同样的濒危海洋”可推测出作者意在说明能源危机已经超越个人的范畴,需要全体人类一起合作。正确答案为A选项。
【干扰项排除】
B选项:“政府的不足”,原文没有提及,属于无中生有;
C选项:“过去和现在的相似”,原文没有提及,属于无中生有;
D选项:“对形势的绝望”,根据第四段最后两句“我们共同需要重新评估我们目前的进程,改变这一进程,并设计新的方法,使世界能够生存下去。这是一个无价的机会”可知作者的态度是比较积极乐观的,该选项属于曲解原文。
第5题:
【选项释义】
Which of the following commitments does the author feel people need to make? 作者认为人们需要做出哪些承诺?
A. Exploring more energy sources. A. 探索更多的能源。
B. Outlawing motor transportation. B. 禁止汽车运输。
C. Taking a new lifestyle. C. 采取一种新的生活方式。
D. Transforming the present, government system. D. 改革现行的政府体制。
【考查点】语义推断题。
【解题思路】根据题干定位答案所在区域为第五段。根据第五段倒数第三句到最后一句内容“我们需要的是一种改变的生活方式。这种新的生活方式可以直接来自科学和技术,但它的接受取决于对世界儿童和后代更高质量生活的最高承诺”可知:人需要做出的承诺是采取新的生活方式。正确答案为C选项。
【干扰项排除】
A、B、D选项原文均未提及,属于无中生有。