The law firm Patrick worked for before he died filed for bankruptcy protection a year after his funeral. After his death, the firm’s letterhead properly included him: Patrick S. Lanigan,1954-1992. He was listed up. in the right-hand corner, just above the paralegals. Then the rumors got started and wouldn’t stop. Before long, everyone believed he had taken the money and disappeared. After three months, no one on the Gulf Coast believed that he was dead. His name came off the letterhead as the debts piled up.
The remaining partners in the law firm were still together, attached unwillingly at the hip by the bondage of mortgages and the bank notes, back when they were rolling and on the verge of serious wealth. They had been joint defendants in several unwinnable lawsuits; thus the bankruptcy Since Patrick’s departure, they had tried every possible way to divorce one another, but nothing would work. Two were raging alcoholics who drank at the office behind locked doors, but never together. The other two were in recovery, still teetering on the brink of sobriety.
He took their money. Their millions. Money they had already spent long before it arrived, as only lawyers can do. Money for their richly renovated office building in downtown Biloxi. Money for new homes, yachts, condos in the Caribbean. The money was on the way, approved, the papers signed, orders entered; they could see it, almost touch it when their dead partner—Patrick—snatched it at the last possible second.
He was dead. They buried him on February 11,1992. They had consoled the widow and put his rotten name on their handsome letterhead. Yet six weeks later, he somehow stole their money.
They had brawled over who was to blame. Charles Bogan, the firm’s senior partner and its iron hand, had insisted the money be wired from its source into a new account offshore, and this made sense after some discussion. It was ninety million bucks, a third of which the firm would keep, and it would be impossible to hide that kind of money in Biloxi, population fifty thousand. Someone at the bank would talk. Soon everyone would know. All four vowed secrecies, even as they made plans to display as much of their new wealth as possible. There had even been talk of a firm jet, a six-seater.
So Bogan took his share of the blame. At forty-nine, he was the oldest of the four, and, at the moment, the most stable. He was also responsible for hiring Patrick nine years earlier, and for this he had received no small amount of grief.
Doug Vitrano, the litigator, had made the fateful decision to recommend Patrick as the fifth partner. The other three had agreed, and when Patrick Lanigan was added to the firm name, he had access to virtually every file in the office. Bogan, Rapley, Vitrano, Havarac, and Lanigan, Attorneys and Counselors-at-Law. A large ad in the yellow pages claimed “Specialists in Offshore Injuries.” Specialists or not, like most firms they would take almost anything if the fees were lucrative, Lots of secretaries, and paralegals. Big overhead, and the strongest political connections on the Coast.
They were all in their mid-to-late forties, Havarac had been raised by his father on a shrimp boat. His hands were still proudly calloused, and he dreamed of choking Patrick until his neck snapped. Rapley was severely depressed and seldom left his home, where he wrote briefs in a dark office in the attic.
1. What happened to the four remaining lawyers after Patrick’s disappearance?
2. Which of the following statements contains a metaphor?
3. According to the passage, what is the main cause of Patrick stealing the money?
4. The lawyers were described as being all the following EXCEPT ________.
5. Which of the following implies a contrast?
问题1选项
A.They all wanted to divorce their wives.
B.They were all heavily involved in debts.
C.They were all recovering from drinking.
D.They had bought new homes, yachts, etc.
问题2选项
A.His name came off the letterhead as the debts piled up.
B.…they could see it, almost touch it when their dead partner…
C.…attached unwillingly at the hip by the bondage of mortgages...
D.…and for this he had received no small amount of grief.
问题3选项
A.Patrick was made a partner of the firm.
B.The partners agreed to have the money transferred.
C.Patrick had access to all the files in the firm.
D.Bogan decided to hire Patrick nine years earlier.
问题4选项
A.greedy
B.extravagant
C.quarrelsome
D.bad-tempered
问题5选项
A...., and it would be impossible to hide that kind of money in Biloxi, population fifty thousand.
B.They had been joint defendants in several unwinnable lawsuits; thus the bankruptcy.
C.There had even been talk of a firm jet, a six-seater.
D.His name came off the letterhead as the debts piled up.
第1题:B
第2题:C
第3题:C
第4题:D
第5题:D
第1题:
【选项释义】
What happened to the four remaining lawyers after Patrick’s disappearance? 帕特里克失踪后剩下的四名律师怎么样了?
A. They all wanted to divorce their wives. A. 他们都想和妻子离婚。
B. They were all heavily involved in debts. B. 他们都债台高筑。
C. They were all recovering from drinking. C. 他们都在戒酒。
D. They had bought new homes, yachts, etc. D. 他们买了新房子、游艇等。
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】根据题干关键词the four remaining lawyers可以定位到文章第一段提到事务所破产后债务堆积(debts piled up),第二段描述合伙人因抵押贷款和银行票据被捆绑,无法分离,直接说明他们深陷债务。因此B选项“他们都债台高筑。”正确。
【干扰项排除】
A选项“他们都想和妻子离婚。”,文中未提及离婚,属于无中生有;
C选项“他们都在戒酒。”,仅两人在戒酒(two in recovery),属于曲解文意;
D选项“他们买了新房子、游艇等。”,购买计划因钱被偷而未实现,实际未发生,属于曲解文意。
第2题:
【选项释义】
Which of the following statements contains a metaphor? 下列哪个陈述包含隐喻?
A. His name came off the letterhead as the debts piled up. A. 随着债务堆积起来,他的名字从信笺上消失了。
B. …they could see it, almost touch it when their dead partner… B. ……他们能看到,几乎能摸到,当他们死去的搭档……
C. …attached unwillingly at the hip by the bondage of mortgages... C. ……被抵押贷款不情愿地捆绑在一起……
D. …and for this he had received no small amount of grief. D. ……为此,他受到了不小的痛苦。
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】“attached at the hip”是隐喻,比喻四人因财务束缚被迫绑定,非字面意义的物理连接。因此C选项“……被抵押贷款不情愿地捆绑在一起……”正确。
【干扰项排除】
A选项为事实描述,B选项为夸张手法,D选项为直述,均不涉及隐喻,属于出处错误。
第3题:
【选项释义】
According to the passage, what is the main cause of Patrick stealing the money? 根据短文,帕特里克偷钱的主要原因是什么?
A. Patrick was made a partner of the firm. A. 帕特里克被任命为公司的合伙人。
B. The partners agreed to have the money transferred. B. 合伙人同意把钱转过去。
C. Patrick had access to all the files in the firm. C. 帕特里克可以查看律所的所有文件。
D. Bogan decided to hire Patrick nine years earlier. D. 博根早在九年前就决定聘用帕特里克。
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】根据题干关键词Patrick可以定位到倒数第二段,文章明确帕特里克成为合伙人后“有权访问所有文件”(access to every file),这为其窃取资金提供了必要条件。因此C选项“帕特里克可以查看律所的所有文件。”正确。
【干扰项排除】
A选项“帕特里克被任命为公司的合伙人。”和D选项“博根早在九年前就决定聘用帕特里克。”,文中指出成为合伙人或受雇是前提,但直接原因是文件访问权,属于曲解文意;
B选项“合伙人同意把钱转过去。”,转账决定是资金被盗的机会,但并非根本原因,属于曲解文意。
第4题:
【选项释义】
The lawyers were described as being all the following EXCEPT ________. 这些律师被描述为以下词句除了________。
A. greedy A. 贪婪的
B. extravagant B. 奢侈的
C. quarrelsome C. 爱争吵的
D. bad-tempered D. 脾气不好的
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】哈瓦拉克有暴力倾向(想掐死帕特里克),但博根被描述为“most stable”,拉普利被描述为“was severely depressed”(抑郁),并非所有人暴躁。因此D选项“脾气不好的”符合题意。
【干扰项排除】
A选项“贪婪的”体现于分赃计划、B选项“奢侈的”体现于游艇等计划和C选项“爱争吵的”体现于责任推诿,在文中均被描述,属于反向干扰。
第5题:
【选项释义】
Which of the following implies a contrast? 下列哪项暗示了对比?
A. ..., and it would be impossible to hide that kind of money in Biloxi, population fifty thousand. A. ……,在人口五万的比洛克西,要藏这么多钱是不可能的。
B. They had been joint defendants in several unwinnable lawsuits; thus the bankruptcy. B. 他们在几起无法获胜的诉讼中都是共同被告;因此破产。
C. There had even been talk of a firm jet, a six-seater. C. 甚至有传言说要建造一架固定的喷气式飞机,一架六座的。
D. His name came off the letterhead as the debts piled up. D. 随着债务堆积起来,他的名字从信笺上消失了。
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】名字从信笺消失(声誉丧失)与债务增加(财务恶化)形成鲜明对比。因此D选项“随着债务堆积起来,他的名字从信笺上消失了。”正确。
【干扰项排除】
A选项为因果关系,B选项为结果陈述,C选项为例证,均无对比结构,属于反向干扰。