Successful innovations have driven many older technologies to extinction and have resulted in higher productivity, greater consumption materials through the economy and increased quantities of metals and other substances in use per capita. The history of industrial development abounds with examples.
In 1870, horses and mules were the prime source of power on US farms. One horse or mule was required to support four human beings — a ration that remained almost constant for many decades. At that time, had a national commission been asked to forecast the horse and mule population for 1970, its answer probably would have depended on whether its consultants were of an economic or technological turn of mind. Had they been “economists”, they would probably have projected the 1970 horse or mule population to be more than 50 million. Had they been “technologists”,they would have recognized that the power of steam had already been harnessed to industry and to land and ocean transport. They would have recognized further that it would be only a matter of time before steam would be the prime source of power on the farm. It would have been difficult for them to avoid the conclusion that the horse and mule population would decline rapidly.
1.According to the passage, what supplied most of the power on U.S. farms in 1870?
2.Which of the following is NOT mentioned by the author as a consequence of new technological developments?
3.It can be inferred from the passage that by 1870( ).
4.In the second paragraph, the author suggests that “economists” would( ).
5.What is the author’s attitude toward changes brought on by technological innovation?
问题1选项
A.Animals
B.Humans
C.Engines
D.Water
问题2选项
A.Older technologies die away.
B.The quality of life is improved.
C.Overall productivity increased
D.More raw materials become necessary
问题3选项
A.technology began to be more commercial
B.the steam engine had been invented
C.the U.S. horse population was about 10 million
D.a national commission on agriculture had been established
问题4选项
A.plan the economy through yearly forecasts
B.fail to consider the influence of technological innovation
C.value the economic contribution of farm animals
D.consult for the national commission on the economy
问题5选项
A.He is excited about them
B.He accepts them as natural
C.He is disturbed by them
D.He questions their usefulness
第1题:A
第2题:B
第3题:B
第4题:B
第5题:B
1.细节事实题。第二段指出: In 1870, horses and mules were the prime source of power on US farms (在1870年,马和骡子是美国农场的主要劳动力),由此可知A项“动物”正确。
2.细节事实题。题干问的是:下列哪项不属于作者所述技术革新的结果?第一段指出: Successful innovations have driven many older technologies to extinction and have resulted in higher productivity, greater consumption materials through the economy (成功的新发明让很多较旧的技术消失,带来了更高的生产力,通过经济发展带来更多数量的消耗材料)。故作者并未提及B项“人的生活质量得到 了改善”。
3.判断推理题。第二段指出: ...they would have recognized that the power of steam had already been harnessed to industry and to land and ocean transport (他们将认识到蒸汽动力已被使用到工业、土地和海洋运输)。由此推测B项“蒸汽引擎已被发明”正确。
4.判断推理题。根据题干关键词“economists”定位至第二段: Had they been “economists”,they would probably have projected the 1970 horse or mule population to be more than 50 million (如果他们是经济学家,那么他们会认为到1970年马或骡子的数量要达到5000万),因此选B项“未能考虑到技术革新的影响”。
5.观点态度题。由第一段中“Successful innovations have driven many older technologies to extinction and have resulted in higher productivity…(成功的新发明让很多较旧的技术消失,提高了生产力…)”和最后一段中“It would have been difficult for them to avoid the conclusion that the horse and mule population would decline rapidly (他们最后很可能会得出这样的结论:马和骡子的数量会迅速减少)”可知作者对于技术革新带来的改变的态度是“自然地接受了他们”。