2026年医学考博英语议论文预测：医疗数字化的利与弊

每年全国医学博士英语统考结束，考生们讨论最热烈的往往不是复杂的阅读篇章，而是那道分值不低、看似熟悉却又难以把握的议论文题目。

主题：医疗数字化的利与弊

Topic: The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Healthcare

Directions: The digital transformation of healthcare brings promises of greater access and efficiency, yet also raises concerns about data privacy, information overload, and equity. What is your perspective on this dual impact? You should write no less than 200 words on the answer paper.

【写作思路】

类型：利弊分析型

开头段：提出核心论点：

1.开篇定性：直接将医疗数字化定义为“双刃剑”，为全文定下辩证基调。

2.概括双边：简要概括积极面（提升可及性与效率）与消极面（引发公平性与人性化担忧）。

主体段：论述积极面与消极面：

1.积极面：指出数字化工具能普及医疗并优化流程。

2.消极面：指出可能加剧不平等并削弱人性化。

结尾段：总结并提出对策：

1.明确立场：承认数字化趋势的必然性与主流益处。

2.提出核心挑战：关键在于如何智慧地引导其发展。

3.给出解决方案：提出具体对策——保障公平、保护数据、坚持以人为本。

【参考范文】

Digitalization of Healthcare: A Double-Edged Sword?

The rapid digitalization of healthcare, encompassing telemedicine and AI diagnostics, presents a classic double-edged sword. While it holds immense potential to improve access and efficiency, it simultaneously raises significant concerns regarding equity and the human touch in medicine.

On the one hand, digital tools democratize and streamline care. Telemedicine bridges geographical barriers, allowing patients in remote areas to consult specialists. AI-powered systems analyze medical images with superhuman speed and accuracy, aiding in early disease detection. Electronic health records enhance coordination among providers, reducing errors. This shift promises a more accessible, efficient, and data-driven healthcare system.

On the other hand, this progress risks exacerbating existing inequalities. The “digital divide” means elderly or low-income populations with limited internet access or literacy may be left behind, creating a two-tiered system. Furthermore, over-reliance on technology can depersonalize medicine. The crucial doctor-patient relationship, built on empathy and nuanced understanding, may erode if interactions are reduced to video calls and algorithm outputs. Data privacy breaches also pose a severe threat in an industry handling our most sensitive information.

In conclusion, digitalization is inevitable and largely beneficial. The challenge lies not in halting it, but in guiding its integration wisely. We must ensure equitable access through public infrastructure investment, safeguard data rigorously, and design systems that augment, rather than replace, the irreplaceable human element of compassionate care.

【全文翻译】

医疗数字化：一把双刃剑？

包含远程医疗和AI诊断在内的医疗快速数字化，呈现出一个经典的双刃剑态势。尽管它在提升医疗可及性和效率方面潜力巨大，但同时也引发了关于公平性和医疗中人文关怀的严重担忧。

一方面，数字化工具正在普及并优化医疗服务。远程医疗打破了地理障碍，让偏远地区的患者能够咨询专家。人工智能驱动的系统以超人的速度和准确性分析医学影像，助力疾病早期发现。电子健康记录加强了不同医疗机构间的协作，减少了差错。这一转变有望带来一个更可及、更高效、更由数据驱动的医疗系统。

另一方面，这一进步有加剧现有不平等的风险。“数字鸿沟”意味着那些互联网接入或使用能力有限的老年人或低收入群体可能会被落下，从而形成一个两极分化的体系。此外，对技术的过度依赖可能使医疗失去人情味。建立在同理心和细微理解基础上的至关重要的医患关系，如果彼此的互动被简化为视频通话和算法输出，就可能遭到侵蚀。在这个处理我们最敏感信息的行业，数据隐私泄露也构成了严重威胁。

总之，数字化不可避免且总体有益。挑战不在于阻止它，而在于智慧地引导其融入。我们必须通过公共基础设施投资来确保公平的可及性，严格保护数据安全，并设计出能够增强而非取代那份充满同情心的、不可替代的人文关怀的系统。