四川大学2009年考博英语真题

考博英语 责任编辑:蒋磊 2019-07-11

摘要:希赛网考博英语频道为大家整理出“四川大学2009年考博英语真题”,更多考博相关信息,请关注希赛网考博英语频道。

四川大学2009年考博英语真题

希赛网考博英语为广大考生整理出四川大学2009年考博英语真题,供大家参考学习。希赛网考博英语名校真题持续更新中,完整版试题请到附件中下载。希望能为大家在考博中提供到帮助。

I. Reading Comprehension (30%; one mark each)

Passage One

The longitudinal study demonstrates that students who receive ESL(English as a second language)instruction are far better than those taught primarily in their native language. A comparison of the three-year exit rates for students in ESL and bilingual programs shows that those who receive ESL instruction test out faster and in higher percentages than those who receive instruction in their native language, regardless of the grade in which they entered school For exar 79.3 percent of the children who entered ESL programs in kindergarten tested out, while only 51.5 percent of those who received their education in their native languages did. Likewise, 72.9 percent of the LEP(limited English proficiency)students who entered programs in the first grad tested out, while only 38.5 of those in bilingual programs did. For students who instruction classes still hadri't tested out after three years, as compared with 78 percent of those in ESL classes.

Furthermore, children who had been in ESL classes tested 4 higher in English and math once they exited LEP programs than those who had received native-language instruction. Of the LEP students who entered in kindergarten or the first grade, 49 percent of those who had been in ESL classes eventually read at grade level, while only 32 percent of those who had been in bilingual classes performed that well. In math, the statistics are even more impressive. Of the children who entered in kindergarten or the first grade, more than 69 percent of those who had been in ESL classes eventually performed at grade level or above, as opposed to 54 percent of those who had been in bilingual classes.

Naturally, the study provoked a barrage of criticism from the highly political and vocal bilingual lobby, which prompted the New York City Board of Education to issue a paper in November 1994 mitigating the findings of the study and ignoring the distinction between students in ESL and bilingual education programs. Rather than exit rates, this paper focuses on the achievement of LEP students during the period in which they are in bilingual or ESL classes. The authors show that although the scores of LEP students were below average on the English-language test, their scores in al areas showed improvement; they point out that in math, there were insufficient data on the progress of LEP students to draw valid conclusions.

However, a report on citywide mathematics test results in New York in the spring of 1995 deals more fully with the math scores of the 26, 248 stud examined the previous school year in Chinese, Spanish, or Haitian Creole. According to this document only 16.6 percent of these children were performing at or above grade level in mathematics. Although this figure represents animprovement of 1.1 percent over the scores of the previous year, it discredits the argument that ne-language instruction keeps performing at grade level in subject areas. Although LEP students are improving faster than the national norm, they continue to perform far below the norm.

1. This text is mainly

[A] a review of ESL, bilingual and LEP instructions

[B] a survey of new approaches to subject instructions

[C] about the merits of LEP education program

[D] about the achievements of bilingual and ESL programs

2. From Paragraph 1 we learn that

[A] ESL instruction could test students faster than LEP instruction

[B] LEP students performed worse than did ESL students

[C] native-language instruction classes seemed to fail utterly

[D] the data of the longitudinal study were likely tentative

3. The author believes(Paragraph 2)that

A] ESL children tested higher in English than LEP children

[B] bilingual programs failed the students performing well in math

[C] the math data are still more credible than those on English

[D] bilingual classes had 54% of students exiting from grade level

4. It can be inferred that the paper mentioned in Paragraph 4

[A] has devalued the findings of the longitudinal study

[B] has dimmed the differences between students in diferent programs

[C] focuses on the subject achievements of LEP students

[D] seeks out the insufficient points in the longitudinal stud

5. According to the NY 1995 report, it is unbelievable that

[A] a great number of multilingual students were examined accuratel

[B] native-language instruction keeps performing well in subjects

[C] any document on subject instructions can draw valid conclusions

[D] LEP students are improving faster than the national norm

更多资料
更多课程
更多真题
温馨提示:因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整,本网站提供的以上信息仅供参考,如有异议,请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准!

考博英语备考资料免费领取

去领取

2024年考博英语考试

具体时间待通知

专注在线职业教育23年

项目管理

信息系统项目管理师

厂商认证

信息系统项目管理师

信息系统项目管理师