北京理工大学2026年考博英语预测作文

北京理工大学26申博英语预测作文：

AI作为合著者：学术诚信的福音还是灾难?

题目：AI as a Co-author: Boon or Bane for Academic Integrity?

范文：

The integration of Artificial intelligence as a writing tool in academia hasignited a fierce debate concerning its impact on scholarly integrity. Proponentshail AI's ability to enhance efficiency, while critics warn it may erode the veryessence of original thought. in my view, AI should be recognized strictly as asophisticated tool, and its use must be governed by transparent ethicalprotocols to prevent it from becoming a threat to integrity.

Undoubtedly, AI offers tremendous benefits. lt can process vast literaturerapidly, suggesting relevant sources and identifying gaps, which significantlyexpedites the initial research phase. For instance, tools like GPT-basedassistants can help non-native English scholars structure arguments and polishlanguage, thereby lowering linguistic barriers and promoting global academicdialogue.This democratizing potential allows researchers to focus more oninnovative ideas rather than mechanical writing tasks.

However, the over-reliance on AI carries profound risks. The most significantdanger is intellectual atrophy-the gradual decline of critical thinking anddeep analytical skills when researchers outsource the synthesis of ideas toalgorithms.Furthermore, the line between legitimate assistance andplagiarism becomes blurred when AI generates content that is not properlyverified or credited. lf undisclosed, this practice constitutes a serious breach ofauthenticity, undermining the trust that academic communication relies upon.

Therefore, the solution lies not in prohibition but in rigorous AIgorithmicaccountability, Academic institutions must establish clear guidelines requiringthe declaration of AI assistance, specifying its role in ideation, drafting, orediting.Simultaneously, the core mission of doctoral training must remain thecultivation of independent, critical intellects capable of using tools wiselywithout being subservient to them. Only through such a bAIanced approachcan we harness the boon of AI while steadfastly avciding its potential to become a bane.

中文译文：

人工智能作为写作工具融入学术界，引发了一场关于其如何影响学术诚信的激烈辩论。支持者赞扬其提升效率的能力，而批评者警告它可能侵蚀原创思想的本质。在我看来，AI应被严格界定为一种高级工具，其使用必须受透明的伦理规范约束，以防止其成为诚信的威胁。

毫无疑问，AI带来了巨大好处。它能快速处理海量文献，推荐相关资源并找出研究空白，这极大加快了初期研究进程。例如，基于GPT的辅助工具可以帮助非英语母语的学者构建论点、润色语言，从而降低语言障碍，促进全球学术对话。这种民主化的潜力让研究者能更专注于创新思想，而非机械的写作任务。

然而，过度依赖AI会带来深远风险。最重大的危险是思想惰性--当研究者将观点综合的任务外包给算法时，批判性思维和深度分析能力会逐渐退化。此外，当AI生成的内容未被妥善验证或注明来源时，合理辅助与抄袭之间的界限便模糊了。若未加以披露，这种行为便构成了对学术真实性的严重破坏，动摇了学术交流所依赖的信任基础。

因此，解决之道在于算法问责而非全面禁止。学术机构必须制定明确指南，要求研究者声明AI辅助的程度与范围，具体说明其在构思、起草或编辑中的作用。同时博士培养的核心使命，必须始终是培育能够明智使用工具而非受其支配的、独立的批判性智力。唯有通过这种平衡之道，我们才能利用AI的福音，同时坚定地避免其潜在的灾难。